This can be a copyrighted, non-free work, however I consider it's Fair Use. It is a photograph or different type of depiction of a copyrighted, three-dimensional artistic work, corresponding to a statue or work of structure. In case you plan to make use of the file for https://www.vapedutch.de/german-flavour-menthol-aroma-10ml any purpose other than this, please don't use this part, https://www.ezigarettesaft.de/bad-candy-nikotinsalz-liquid-blue-bubble-10ml but the one labelled "other type of non-free work" below. Will probably be included as that work's primary means of visible identification, at the highest of the article about the ebook, movie, and many others.

in query. We'll usually not use a file if its proprietor J.W.Yo@moskraeved.ru has a potential industrial interest in its use, and if our use of it will compete with its authentic market function. This license will likely be irrevocable. Keep in mind that using non-free files should be minimal. I have learn the Wikipedia rules on Non-free content material, and I will clarify how this file meets all of the factors set out there. The copyright proprietor of this file has given it to me for uploading on Wikipedia.

This manner it can be used solely on the English Wikipedia. I can display that this work is legally in the general public Domain, i.e. no person owns any copyrights on it. I can present evidence that they have agreed to release it below a free license, for free use by anybody and https://www.vapedutch.de/187-stra?enbande-prefilled-pod-beach-vibez-20mg for any objective. I took it from an internet site or different printed source, the place its writer has explicitly positioned it under a free license, permitting free re-use by anybody.

The image was created and https://www.vapedutch.de/nameless-einweg-e-zigarette-cola-lemon-20mg-cp printed by the same creator who also holds the rights to the unique object, https://www.ezigarettesaft.de/keep-it-100-pod- C-ki-berry-killa and no different depiction could be suitably created. Provide a link to the place the author explicitly says that the file is released underneath a free license. Please explain why this function could not be served with an alternate, free illustration that could but be found or created. This file is from a free published supply. Use this only if there's an express licensing statement in the source.

Often such local files are copied to the Commons for use elsewhere and deleted domestically, requiring additional work for other volunteers. We urge you to add it to the Commons except there may be a very good motive for it to stay native. Text is out there below the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.Zero License; additional phrases could apply. Please clarify why this goal couldn't be served by textual content alone.